Prosperous Period for US Billionaires: How the System Sustains Income Disparity
Among countless Americans, the financial landscape over the recent five-year span has been challenging. Prices have escalated while pay remains unchanged. High mortgage rates have made purchasing property a bleak prospect. The jobless rate has been slowly rising.
Many Americans have stated they're postponing major life decisions, including raising children or moving to new employment, because of economic uncertainty. But for a very small group of people, the past five-year period couldn't have been any better.
The Billionaire Boom
The wealth of the world's billionaires expanded 54% in 2020, at the height of the pandemic. And even amid all the economic instability, the stock market has only kept rising. This growth has largely benefited just a small number of Americans: 10% of the population owns 93% of stock market wealth.
However unequal as this allocation seems, it's the financial structure working as it is existing today.
"Affluent individuals have acquired their jets, they've bought their multiple houses and mansions, but now they're securing senators and media outlets," stated economic inequality analyst Chuck Collins. "We're now moving into this other chapter of hyper-extraction where the wealthy are exploiting the system of inequality."
Mapping Economic Classes
To help others comprehend what exactly it means to be "wealthy" in the US, Collins adopts a concept from journalist Robert Frank who, in a 2007 book on the rich, conceptualized the different levels of wealth as "Wealthville" villages: Affluent Town, Lower Richistan, Middle Richistan, Upper Richistan and Billionaireville.
To update the concept, Collins classifies these "wealth villages" based on income levels:
- At the foundation, Affluent Town, are the 10 million Americans who have a family earnings of at least $110,000 and an overall wealth of over $1.5m.
- The villages get more restricted as wealth goes up: Lower Richistan has 2.6 million households who have wealth between $6m and $13m.
- Middle Richistan has 1.3 million households who have assets worth an average of $37m.
- Upper Richistan, made up of 130,000 Americans (roughly the size of a small city) has between $60m to $1bn in wealth.
Collectively, the residents of these villages comprise the top 10% of the wealth income distribution, about 14 million Americans altogether, though their circumstances vary dramatically.
"You could be in Lower Richistan, and you're still sitting in the coach section of a commercial plane," Collins noted. "Whereas in Upper Richistan, you're traveling via a private jet. That's a really distinct lifestyle. You fly private, you have no investment in the commercial aviation system. You don't care if the whole system collapses – you're set."
The Billionaireville Effect
The highest hill in "Richistan" is Billionaireville, which is made up of about 800 American billionaires who are some of the world's richest. The power that this group has substantially outweighs those who are simply wealthy, let alone the typical citizen who doesn't live in "Richistan" at all.
But Collins thinks the progressive slogan "abolish billionaires" misses the point and has a "hint of elimination" to it.
"It's the difference between personal actions and a system of rules," Collins commented. "We should be concerned about an economic system that directs so much wealth upward to the billionaires."
Fortune Building Strategies
To understand how wealth at the billionaire level works, Collins divides it into four parts: accumulating assets, defending the wealth, political capture and hyper-extraction.
When many Americans think about wealth, they usually think exclusively about the first step, Collins said. People can create a modest amount of wealth through establishing or managing a successful business, which could get them residency in Affluent Town.
But getting to Billionaireville requires serious investment and planning in those next three steps. Collins describes what he calls the "fortune security field": the tax lawyers, accountants and wealth managers who use their skills to ensure that the super rich are being strategic about their taxes.
"Wealth defense professionals use a broad range of tools such as trusts, foreign deposits, anonymous shell companies, charitable foundations and other vehicles to hold assets," he explains.
Political Influence and Hyper-Extraction
To advance a wealth defense strategy, a family needs policy assistance. Wealth of over $40m becomes political power, Collins says, and can be used to protect assets and ensure continued growth.
The final phase is a different kind of wealth accumulation, one that Collins calls "maximum taking" to describe how the wealthy have come to touch nearly every single part of an Americans' routine activities largely through investment firms, which allows wealthy individuals to support private companies.
"Private equity is looking for those areas of the economy where they can increase profits a little bit harder," Collins said. "One thing I don't think people realize is these billionaire private-equity funds are what happens when so much wealth is accumulated in so few hands, and they can kind of turn around and say, 'Where else can we generate returns out of the economy?' Healthcare? Great. Mobile home parks? These people can't go anywhere, [so] you can increase their costs."
Tangible Effects
The consequences of this inequality go beyond the wealth getting wealthier. It's about people paying more for their healthcare, rent and vet bills without seeing any meaningful wage increases. And Collins said the hardship and discontent of this kind of society can lead to serious unrest.
"The most powerful affluent rulers understand people are being left behind [and] are financially struggling," Collins said, adding that right-leaning leaders have been good at connecting with a potent "false common-man appeal".
Political Reality
The paradox, Collins points out in his book, is that government officials have appointed a series of billionaires to cabinet positions. Along with affluent innovators who had brief but powerful roles overseeing significant decreases to the federal workforce, other key positions for commerce, treasury, education and the interior are also all billionaires.
This administrative framework, along with help from legislative supporters, helped pass huge tax bills, which will make enduring decreases for the wealthy and corporations.
Future Solutions
While political parties continue to argue that foreign entry and unfavorable commercial treaties are the source of everyone's economic problems, "the question becomes: Will the opposing party, which has also been captured by the billionaires and big money, be able to meaningfully address the underlying harms?" Collins said.
Left-leaning officials, he argues, know what policies are needed to "change wealth distribution", including significant reforms to the tax system, boosting the minimum wage and strengthening unions.
"It was so, so close, and the bill really did represent the will of the bulk of people who really want lawmakers to fix some of these critical challenges," Collins said. "Elite control is not about developing so much as stopping. It's easier to block than it is to make something meaningful happen, but the historical precedent is there. We know what that looks like."
Collins is positive that there can be change, but said it would require ongoing legislative effort.
"It may be before we know it that the pendulum swings back, and then it really is about sustaining a sustained really popular movement to make progress on this extreme inequality we're living in," he said. "We can solve this. It is addressable."